Innobarometer
The Innobarometer is made available within the Eurobarometer series of publications and provides an evaluation of public support measures and programmes for innovation from the business perspective.
The following Innobarometer reports are currently available (click on the title for details):
-
Innobarometer 2009: Analytical report and Innobarometer 2009: Summary
- Innobarometer 2007: Analytical report on Innovation Transfer
The main findings of the Innobarometer 2007 can be summarized as following:
Innovation is the norm: In a large number of EU countries (as well as in Norway and Switzerland), in the selected innovation-intensive industries, the norm is to be involved in innovation, with about nine out of 10 enterprises (in a range from 86% to 94%) reporting that they have undertaken one or more, of the defined in the report, innovative activities.
R&D is not the only source of innovation: Enterprises engage in significant amounts of innovative activities that do not involve either in-house or contracted-out R&D. On average, managers classified only one-fifth of all innovation-related expenditure as R&D (20%). In three countries, this proportion is significantly higher. Almost every second euro that was spent on innovation was R&D-related in Finland (48%), Hungary (46%) and Sweden (44%).
Innovation leads to greater turnover: Regarding changes in turnover between 2004 and 2006, it appears that innovative enterprises are more successful (or more successful companies innovate), although those not innovating were much more reluctant to share this information with the Innobarometer survey. Still, the raw figures do indicate that innovating companies are more likely to have a turnover that’s been increasing in recent years.
Size is important: Innovation is more characteristic of larger enterprises, which partly explains most of the differences we observed between those who innovate and those who do not. The average staff size of innovating companies (among enterprises employing a staff of at least 20) is almost three times as large (217) as the number of persons employed by firms that are not being innovative (66).
Large companies invest in R&D: First and foremost, large enterprises (with 250+ persons employed) invest in R&D (60%); medium-sized (44%) and small enterprises (36%) are significantly less likely to spend on R&D.
Product-related innovation gets priority: Forty-seven percent of companies confirmed that product-related innovation (concerning produced goods) is the type that’s the most widespread across the EU, with service-related actions being somewhat less frequently reported as having been improved or newly introduced during the past two years (40%).
Download the Innobarometer 2007
- Innobarometer 2006: Analytical report on the role of clusters in facilitating innovation in Europe
The survey finds that top-level company managers are generally aware of the relatively new concept of company clusters, especially in the old Member States. On average, every fourth company with at least 20 employees in the European Union work in a cluster-like environment characterised by close cooperation with other local businesses and strong ties to local business infrastructure. However, the average figure is much lower in the new Member States.
At the same time, 17% of surveyed companies participating in a cluster indicated that the prospect of joining a cluster was a prime reason for choosing their location.
The proportion of companies in a cluster-like environment is highest in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Latvia, while the highest level and intensity of networking was found in the Nordic region.
The most widespread benefits of being part of a cluster are related to human resources, a stimulation of the entrepreneurial spirit and the development of partnerships. In addition, three-quarters of the strategic leaders in cluster companies across the EU agree that stronger competition in their cluster leads to better competitiveness and seven out of ten confirm that stronger competition is an immanent part of the success of their clusters.
Companies active in cluster environment are more innovative than the most innovative European companies interviewed by the 2004 Innobarometer.
There is a widespread perception (over two thirds of cluster company managers) that public authorities have at least important if not fundamental roles in supporting the cluster.
Download the Innobarometer 2006
- Population Innovation Readiness Report (2005)
The report finds that Malta and Slovakia are the Member States with the highest proportion of pro-innovation citizens. However, a relatively large proportion of countries follow very closely behind.
On the other side of the coin, citizens in Poland and Latvia are found to be least ready to embrace innovation as over three in five are classified as “anti-innovation” or “reluctant”. However, the highest proportions of “anti-innovation” citizens are in Greece (22%), Cyprus (21%) and Portugal (20%). A similarly high proportion of Bulgarians (20%) falls under this category.
Nonetheless, on average a majority of EU citizens associates innovation more with the creation of new products or services (52%) over the improvement of existing ones (39%). Similarly, a comfortable majority of 57% of EU citizens declares that they feel attracted towards innovative products or services.
Download the Population Innovation Readiness Report
- Innobarometer 2004
31% of EU innovative firms use at least one form of public support for their innovation activities. However, only 12% use public support to innovation for which they are eligible, which proves that further improvement can be achieved with regard to the coverage of public initiatives. Cypriot and Austrian firms are the most active. Firms in the new Member States use relatively less public support to assist their innovation.
However, several public support programmes are highly rated by EU firms. Public support to develop "Collaboration" and "Training for Innovation" rank first, programmes to support "Adoption of process technology" and "R&D" follow.
No general correlation can be made between public support to innovation and innovation performance as measured by the European Innovation Scoreboard, with the notable exception of networking activities. Empirical evidence suggests that good innovation performance is strongly dependent on strong networking among companies. Surprisingly, public support to networking is however not ranked among the best programmes used by EU firms.
According to EU firms, Germany is thought to have both the most burdensome regulation and the most effective support programmes for innovation.
Download the Innobarometer 2004
Download the Analysis of the Innobarometer 2004 Survey
- Innobarometer 2003
- Innobarometer 2002
- Innobarometer 2001
Download the full report in English
Short versions are available in German (DE) and French (FR)
Download the Innobarometer 2002 (EN)
Download the Innobarometer 2002 (DE)
Download the Innobarometer 2002 (FR)
Download the Innobarometer 2001 (EN)
Download the Innobarometer 2001 (DE)
Download the Innobarometer 2001 (FR)







