FIRST EVALUATION OF THE VINNOVA VINN EXCELLENCE CENTRES NGIL, HELIX, SAMOT AND ECO2 TOGETHER WITH THE STEM COMPETENCE CENTRE CICERO

Submitted by s.pietropaolo on 23 September, 2009 - 12:01
Trendchart MEASURE(S) LINKED: 
SE 79 VINN Excellence Centre
FIRST EVALUATION OF THE VINNOVA VINN EXCELLENCE CENTRES NGIL, HELIX, SAMOT AND ECO2 TOGETHER WITH THE STEM COMPETENCE CENTRE CICERO
Documents
Appraisal Main Report: 
application/pdf icon3891SE79_T1_Appraisal_Report.pdf
Appraisal Characteristics
Who conducted the appraisal ?: 
Mixed
Timing of the appraisal: 
Interim (during the implementation of the policy measure, one point in time)
Purpose of the appraisal: 
Both
Country: 
Sweden
Topics covered in the appraisal (Questions that the appraisal aims to answer)
Internal Consistency (If the measure's modalities were appropriate and consistent with its goals): 
Yes
Programme Implementation Efficiency (If the measure was well-managed): 
Yes
Project Implementation Efficiency (If projects supported by the measure were well-managed): 
Yes
Input Additionality (If the measure stimulated more investment in innovation than would have occurred in the absence of the meas: 
Yes
Output Additionality (If the measure stimulated more innovation outputs than would have occurred in the absence of the measure): 
Yes
Behavioural Additionality (If the measure stimulated persistent changes in the behaviours of the participants that would have no: 
Yes
Policy/Strategy Development (Implications for future strategy development and policy formulation): 
Yes
Gender issues: 
Yes
Did the appraisal look at the following inpacts?
Scientific: 
Yes, but only impact on the participants
Technological: 
Yes, but only impact on the participants
Economic: 
Yes, but only impact on the participants
Sponsor(s) of the appraisal
Programme Owner/Manager: 
Yes
Other Government Department: 
Yes
Oher Public Bodies (e.g. court of auditors, parliament committee): 
Yes
Data analysis method employed in the appraisal
Case Study Analysis: 
Employed
Network Analysys: 
Employed
Data collection methods and data sources employed in the appraisal
Interviews: 
Employed
Focus Groups/Workshops/Meetings: 
Employed
Main intended audiences for the appraisal
Policy Makers (Politicians): 
Yes
Policy Makers (Government Officials): 
Yes
Programme Management: 
Yes
Auditors/Financial Authorities: 
Yes
Those directly supported by the measure: 
Yes
External/International (co)sponsor of the measure/programme: 
Yes
Potential Users of the Measure: 
Yes
Policy Analysts: 
Yes
General Public: 
Yes
Quality of the Appraisal
Where the Terms of Reference available in the appraisal report?: 
Yes
  • 191 reads