Ex-ante evaluation of the Operational Programme for the Information Society 2000-2006-Greece

Submitted by nsennhauser on 5 February, 2009 - 01:00
Ex-ante evaluation of the Operational Programme for the Information Society 2000-2006-Greece
Documents
Appraisal Main Report: 
application/pdf iconGRX1_T1_Appraisal_Report.pdf
Appraisal Characteristics
Who conducted the appraisal ?: 
External
Timing of the appraisal: 
Ex-Ante (before the implementation of the policy measure)
Purpose of the appraisal: 
Formative ("supporting")
Country: 
Greece
Topics covered in the appraisal (Questions that the appraisal aims to answer)
Internal Consistency (If the measure's modalities were appropriate and consistent with its goals): 
Yes
Coherence/Complementarity (Whether the measure was coherent with, and complementary to, other programmes and policy initiatives): 
Yes
Outputs, Outcomes and Impacts (The consequences or results of the measure): 
Yes
Project Implementation Efficiency (If projects supported by the measure were well-managed): 
Yes
Input Additionality (If the measure stimulated more investment in innovation than would have occurred in the absence of the meas: 
Yes
Output Additionality (If the measure stimulated more innovation outputs than would have occurred in the absence of the measure): 
Yes
Policy/Strategy Development (Implications for future strategy development and policy formulation): 
Yes
Gender issues: 
Yes
Minority issues: 
Yes
Did the appraisal look at the following inpacts?
Scientific: 
No
Technological: 
Yes, on the participants and beyond
Economic: 
Yes, on the participants and beyond
Environmental: 
Yes, on the participants and beyond
Sponsor(s) of the appraisal
Programme Owner/Manager: 
Yes
Other Government Department: 
No
Oher Public Bodies (e.g. court of auditors, parliament committee): 
No
Data analysis method employed in the appraisal
Case Study Analysis: 
Not Employed
Network Analysys: 
Not Employed
Econometric Analysis: 
Not Employed
Descriptive Statistics (e.g. updake analysis): 
Employed
Input/Output Analysis: 
Employed
Document Analysis: 
Employed
Context Analysis: 
Employed
Before/After Group Comparison Approach: 
Not Employed
Control Group Approach: 
Not Employed
Cost/Benefit Approach: 
Employed
Data collection methods and data sources employed in the appraisal
Existing Surveys/Databases: 
Employed
Participant Surveys: 
Employed
Non-participant Surveys: 
Employed
Interviews: 
Not Employed
Focus Groups/Workshops/Meetings: 
Employed
Peer Reviews: 
Not Employed
Technometrics/Bibliometrics Search: 
Not Employed
Document Search: 
Employed
Main intended audiences for the appraisal
Policy Makers (Politicians): 
Yes
Policy Makers (Government Officials): 
Yes
Programme Management: 
Yes
Auditors/Financial Authorities: 
Yes
Those directly supported by the measure: 
Yes
External/International (co)sponsor of the measure/programme: 
Yes
Potential Users of the Measure: 
Yes
Policy Analysts: 
Yes
General Public: 
Yes
Quality of the Appraisal
Where the Terms of Reference available in the appraisal report?: 
No
  • 198 reads