Ex-ante evaluation of the Operational Programme for Competitiveness 2000-2006, Greece

Submitted by nsennhauser on 5 February, 2009 - 01:00
Ex-ante evaluation of the Operational Programme for Competitiveness 2000-2006, Greece
Documents
Appraisal Main Report: 
application/zip icon2621GRX4_T2_Appraisal_Report.zip
Appraisal Characteristics
Who conducted the appraisal ?: 
Internal
Timing of the appraisal: 
Ex-Ante (before the implementation of the policy measure)
Purpose of the appraisal: 
Formative ("supporting")
Country: 
Greece
Topics covered in the appraisal (Questions that the appraisal aims to answer)
Coherence/Complementarity (Whether the measure was coherent with, and complementary to, other programmes and policy initiatives): 
Yes
Outputs, Outcomes and Impacts (The consequences or results of the measure): 
Yes
Value for Money/Return on Investment/Cost-Benefit Efficiency (If there were adequate returns on investment): 
Yes
Input Additionality (If the measure stimulated more investment in innovation than would have occurred in the absence of the meas: 
No
Output Additionality (If the measure stimulated more innovation outputs than would have occurred in the absence of the measure): 
No
Behavioural Additionality (If the measure stimulated persistent changes in the behaviours of the participants that would have no: 
No
Policy/Strategy Development (Implications for future strategy development and policy formulation): 
Yes
Gender issues: 
Yes
Minority issues: 
Yes
Did the appraisal look at the following inpacts?
Scientific: 
No
Technological: 
Yes, on the participants and beyond
Economic: 
Yes, on the participants and beyond
Environmental: 
Yes, on the participants and beyond
Sponsor(s) of the appraisal
Programme Owner/Manager: 
Don't Know
Other Government Department: 
Don't Know
Oher Public Bodies (e.g. court of auditors, parliament committee): 
Don't Know
Data analysis method employed in the appraisal
Case Study Analysis: 
Not Employed
Econometric Analysis: 
Not Employed
Descriptive Statistics (e.g. updake analysis): 
Employed
Input/Output Analysis: 
Not Employed
Document Analysis: 
Employed
Context Analysis: 
Employed
Before/After Group Comparison Approach: 
Employed
Cost/Benefit Approach: 
Employed
Data collection methods and data sources employed in the appraisal
Existing Surveys/Databases: 
Employed
Participant Surveys: 
Not Employed
Non-participant Surveys: 
Not Employed
Interviews: 
Not Employed
Focus Groups/Workshops/Meetings: 
Not Employed
Peer Reviews: 
Not Employed
Technometrics/Bibliometrics Search: 
Not Employed
Document Search: 
Employed
Main intended audiences for the appraisal
Policy Makers (Politicians): 
No
Policy Makers (Government Officials): 
No
Programme Management: 
Yes
Auditors/Financial Authorities: 
Yes
Those directly supported by the measure: 
No
External/International (co)sponsor of the measure/programme: 
Yes
Potential Users of the Measure: 
No
Policy Analysts: 
Yes
General Public: 
No
Quality of the Appraisal
Where the Terms of Reference available in the appraisal report?: 
No
  • 180 reads